LIKE FANCYCACHE BUT FREE HOW TO
LIKE FANCYCACHE BUT FREE UPGRADE
LIKE FANCYCACHE BUT FREE SOFTWARE
LIKE FANCYCACHE BUT FREE DOWNLOAD

However, I did try all of the following: 'Pause Caching' 'Stop Caching' 'Pause DeferWrite' and even 'Exiting' the program entirely. I do not see any 'disable' button or function. Regarding your question, 'Why didnВґt you disable FC during the operation of AS Cleaner?' Microsoft might be unfriendly towards that company. To my knowledge, no company claims credit for creating 'AS Cleaner 0.5' or 'FreeSpaceCleaner.exe'. Of course, that may be the compiler specifications and not the actual program itself. When you unzip the download, it titles itself 'FreeSpaceCleaner.exe' and its 'Properties, Version' tab says:

LIKE FANCYCACHE BUT FREE DOWNLOAD

You can still download 'AS Cleaner 0.5' here for free: The key to success is to check the 'FF' box so '1' (1 = erased for use without an erase cycle before write) is written to all the free Nand on the SSD. In truth, 'AS Cleaner 0.5' allows XP users to manually trim their SSD back to the original FAST performance. Microsoft may want the 200 million users of XP (32 bit) to wrongly think that they must buy Win7 if they want to use SSD's. 'AS Cleaner 0.5' is mostly famous among computer technicians who still use XP.

LIKE FANCYCACHE BUT FREE SOFTWARE

I was once a Microsoft software engineer and still work on many XP computers so I may know something. I will be curious to see when something else using the hero engine (such as elder scrolls) has similar issues which would speak to it being a tied to server, coding, or engine.Thanks for your comments, YET the 'AS Cleaner 0.5' program itself says Microsoft is the author in 2009. Interesting read and glad someone went and did the actual legwork for something like this. If someone is telling you it is a HDD bottleneck, it really doesn't seem to be the case. The load times NEVER changed no matter what I did to reduce, eliminate, or buffer disk I/O. This tends to agree with my RAM disk tests and my RAM level 2 cache buffer tests (Fancењњache).

Random: Read - 441.9 MB/s, Write 287.7 MB/sДЄn interesting addendum to these results is that I was watching disk IO while it was loading Corellia.

I couldn't imagine what they're like for people who don't have a beast of a system to run this game.Д®DIT: Given someone suggested my 2nd generation SSDs aren't fast enough to speed up the load times, I present the following numbers for my RAID-0 setup using Crystal Disk Mark 3.0.1c: I consider some of these loading times to be annoying at the very least.

Voss (because my alt is there): 35 seconds.

Loading Times: (used the space bar to skip all cut scenes of the ship flying down) In another thread a week or two ago I did some testing with regards to the load times.

LIKE FANCYCACHE BUT FREE UPGRADE

So your best solutions for speeding up times would be a solid state drive or its budget alternative of installing it to a flash drive instead.ДЇrom a recent upgrade in CPU and graphics card that made tremendous strides in-game (25-35 fps on mid-low settings to 70-80 on high) I noticed my load time was basically unaltered which is evidence to me that the above is true. What did you do? What was the issue?ДЇrom what I've read these load times are very much Hard drive based so all the horsepower in the world in other avenues won't change a whole lot. So what I am looking for are people that HAD horrible load times (1 minute+) that have RESOLVED them. User1: 'My computer is great, runs single_player_game01 at 1,000 FPS on uber ultra'

LIKE FANCYCACHE BUT FREE HOW TO

Unfortunately there is little to no dialogue on how to improve load times, rather the conversations go something like this: On the forums there are multiple threads talking about how specific planets take a while to load.

Like fancycache but free